 |
|
Home > Resources
> School Design > Teacher Collaboration & Learning
sidebar: Professional Development: School-Based, Goal-Centered, Non-Stop, Exploratory
Type: Old Horace (vol 5-17)
Author(s): Kathleen Cushman
Source: Horace. Vol. 9, #3. Jan. 1993.
|
|
If teachers in Essential
schools are to shape
sweeping changes
in everything from
classroom practices
to school structures,
they will need sustained
coaching in how to
do it. A growing
number of analysts
regard professional
development as the
single most important
key to the change
process. And new
ways of linking teachers'
learning opportunities
directly to school
goals and integrating
such opportunities
into the everyday
life of the school
are proving the most
effective elements
of managing the change
process.
Whether teachers are
learning how to work
in teams with the
help of an outside
facilitator, or meeting
in peer study groups
to design curricula
or practice new teaching
methods, the best
professional development
appears to be continuing,
school-based, and
inclusive -- a far
cry from the isolated
"in- service" workshops
traditionally arranged
by district offices
without meaningful
follow-up and evaluation.
Teachers engage in
exploring genuine
problems and questions
arising from their
own situations --
"What would portfolio
assessment look like
in our school?" for
example -- in the
context of important
outside research.
They have time to
work out answers
that emerge from
their own explorations
in the classroom,
and to reflect together
on ways to shape
school policy to
help their teaching
practice grow stronger.
Such an approach
treats teaching as
a true professional
challenge, a continuing
intellectual activity
on which practitioners
may leave their mark.
Rancho San Joaquin
Middle School in
Irvine, California
carved out a full-time
position seven years
ago for teacher Roger
King to prod, provoke,
coach, and encourage
his colleagues' professional
growth on a daily
basis. "A new teacher
here quickly understands
the school's expectation
that teachers have
an active role in
their own professional
development," King
says. "It goes beyond
teaching their subject,
moving toward helping
create the design
of the school, especially
what happens in teaching
and learning." King
continually solicits
feedback on what
teachers need; when
they complained that
one-day events did
not go deep enough,
for example, he led
a two-day staff workshop
on authentic assessment.
"They worked in small
groups," King says.
"At the end everyone
presented the assessment
project they had
designed, and the
whole faculty gave
feedback." Since
then, a number of
teachers have begun
to work on developing
new assessments.
"I help them think
about how their idea
worked, what they
have learned, how
they would fashion
it differently,"
he says. "I ask them
if they need extra
time or outside assistance,
or if they'd like
to work with another
teacher, and if so,
I arrange it."
What makes King's
position work, says
fellow teacher Erin
Hughes, is that he
is neither administrator
nor supervisor, but
an "idea person"
who continually keeps
people thinking about
their professional
roles. "Too often
someone comes up
with a great idea
but it escapes in
their everyday routine,"
she says. "His job
is to remind people
and to make it happen."
For resistant teachers,
prodding of this
nature can be "a
fly in the ointment,"
Hughes concedes.
"Change is frightening
on a personal level
-- it doesn't always
feel good, even though
it might be valuable.
They might say he
hasn't affected their
teaching at all.
But they also might
not see how the seeds
he's planted in the
minds of others might
have affected their
work."
A Citibank Faculty
member, Hughes herself
works as an outside
facilitator and coach
for nearby schools,
in a scenario many
schools prefer. "It
helps to have someone
come in who knows
more about how teams
function," she says.
"But it's got to
be a regular thing.
You can get a positive
feeling from doing
one small experience
with teaming, but
you have to come
back to it, practice
it, build on it.
If you don't continually
revisit it like a
garden, cultivating
people's abilities
to work together,
then it gets lost."
"It is an amazing
hurdle for teachers
to discuss what they
do and why they do
it with a peer who
has actually seen
them at work," declare
Parker McMullen and
Patricia Roy, consultants
on organizational
change who have given
seminars on teambuilding
at Coalition gatherings.
"Yet we frequently
assume that all it
takes to get teachers
to work as a team
is to give them common
planning time." Building
trust among an entire
faculty over time,
McMullen and Roy
assert, must be the
first goal of school
change. "With an
external facilitator,
this can take months,"
they say. "Without
one, it may never
happen."
The Coalition's National
Re:Learning Faculty
aims to provide such
assistance, by preparing
teachers, principals,
and district-level
staff to work as
"critical friends"
both within their
own schools and districts
and with others nearby.
But since National
Faculty members do
not take leave from
their jobs to do
this, time can be
a problem. "You can't
just walk in and
understand another
school right off,"
says Chuck Bowen,
who was Broadmoor's
school coach under
Illinois Re:Learning's
system for a year
before he became
principal there.
"I averaged half
a day a week in the
building, but I spent
much more time than
that on the phone,
in my office working
through and analyzing
issues, talking with
different factions
in the school and
the district, maintaining
an overall understanding
of what was going
on."
Finally, giving teachers
time to seek outside
perspectives seems
to build a continuing
sense of professional
exploration. "We
just had an in-service
day where every teacher
was asked to go visit
another school,"
says Joseph Jennelle,
who heads Pennsylvania's
Central Bucks East
High School. "Most
of our Re:Learning
funds go to hire
substitutes so teachers
can do this kind
of thing. One of
our clear goals is
to move together
-- opening up opportunities
to everyone, not
just a select group.
They need to see
how all this is in
their best interests
-- to project way
down the road to
see if it's good
for teaching and
learning."
This resource last updated: May 14, 2002
Database Information:
|
Source: Horace. Vol. 9, #3. Jan. 1993.
Publication Year: 1993
Publisher: CES National
Type: Horace Sidebar
School Level: All
Issue: 9.3
Focus Area: School Design
STRAND: School Design: teacher collaboration & learning
Teacher Collaboration and Learning: Peer Coaching, Critical Friends Groups
|
|
|